Skip to content Skip to navigation

Guo Feixiong Challenges Tianhe Court’s Conviction and Sentence

December 4, 2015

In an appeal to the Guangzhou Municipal Intermediate People’s Court, rights defender Guo Feixiong (郭飞雄), also known as Yang Maodong (杨茂东), who was sentenced last week to six years of imprisonment for “gathering crowds to disrupt order in public places” and “picking quarrels and provoking troubles,” challenges the validity of the ruling of the trial court, the Tianhe District People’s Court, and requests a retrial.

Among the main arguments Guo made are:

  • The court failed to show that his protest activities outside the main gate of the Southern Media Group in January 2013—in support of the strike by Southern Weekly’s editorial staff against Party editorial interference—“caused serious disorder on the scene.” That he did not cause public disorder was “directly proven by all the videos shown in court: of me making speeches, [of other scenes] made by Domestic Security police, and of the traffic diagonally opposite to the spot where I was making speeches,” Guo stated.
  • The testimonies by witnesses Yuan Bing (袁兵) and Yuan Xiaohua (袁小华) were extracted under torture and beating, and their use as evidence at trial was therefore unlawful.
  • The court’s ruling cited falsified contents of his defense statement and made-up statements purportedly offered by him. He wrote in the appeal, “During the pre-trial period, I gave zero answers to questions about the protest in support of the Southern Weekly and the “Eight City Flash Actions” [public protests in eight cities in 2014 involving raising placards to call for disclosure of high-level officials’ assets] . . . . But the verdict cited my ‘statements’” about planning the actions.

Guo argues that the court, in basing its ruling on coerced testimony, evidence that did not support the criminal charge, and testimony that was made up, was in violation of Article 53 of the Criminal Procedure Law.

Related Resources


Explore Topics

709 Crackdown Access to Information Access to Justice Administrative Detention All about law Arbitrary Detention
Asset Transparency Bilateral Dialogue Black Jail Book Review Business And Human Rights Censorship
Charter 08 Children Chinese Law Circumvention technology Citizen Activism Citizen Journalists
Citizen Participation Civil Society Commentary Communist Party Of China Constitution Consumer Safety
Contending views Corruption Counterterrorism Courageous Voices Cultural Revolution Culture Matters
Current affairs Cyber Security Daily Challenges Democratic And Political Reform Demolition And Relocation  Dissidents
Education Elections Enforced Disappearance Environment Ethnic Minorities EU-China
Family Planning Farmers Freedom of Association Freedom of Expression Freedom of Press Freedom of Religion
Government Accountability Government regulation Government transparency Hong Kong House Arrest HRIC Translation
Hukou Human Rights Council Human rights developments Illegal Search And Detention Inciting Subversion Of State Power Information Control 
Information technology Information, Communications, Technology (ICT) International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR) International Human Rights International perspective International Relations
Internet Internet Governance JIansanjiang lawyers' rights defense Judicial Reform June Fourth Kidnapping
Labor Camps Labor Rights Land, Property, Housing Lawyer's rights Lawyers Legal System
Letters from the Mainland Major Event (Environment, Food Safety, Accident, etc.) Mao Zedong Microblogs (Weibo) National People's Congress (NPC) New Citizens Movement
Non-Governmental Organization (NGO) Olympics One country, two systems Online Activism Open Government Information Personal stories
Police Brutality Political commentary Political Prisoner Politics Prisoner Of Conscience Probing history
Propaganda Protests And Petitions Public Appeal Public Security Racial Discrimination Reeducation-Through-Labor
Rights Defenders Rights Defense Rule Of Law Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO) Special Topic State compensation
State Secrets State Security Subversion Of State Power Surveillance Technology Thoughts/Theories
Tiananmen Mothers Tibet Torture Typical cases United Nations US-China 
Uyghurs, Uighurs Vulnerable Groups Women Youth Youth Perspective
Error | Human Rights in China 中国人权 | HRIC


The website encountered an unexpected error. Please try again later.