Skip to content Skip to navigation

Statement by Cheng Hao, brother of Cheng Yuan, about his interrogation by police

August 12, 2019

On August 12, Cheng Hao, brother of Cheng Yuan, the detained Changsha legal advocate, posted a statement (see below) on Twitter about his interrogation by the police of Zhonghuamen police station in Nanjing on August 8, on suspicion of “picking quarrels and provoking trouble” (寻衅滋事).

Cheng Hao was questioned about the basis for, and the contents and authenticity of, the Twitter posts he previously sent out about his brother’s case, and why he did not file a complaint or lawsuit instead. Cheng Hao responded that since Cheng Yuan’s alleged offense was “subversion of state power” (颠覆国家政权), “state power,” as the alleged victim, in accordance with the law, has an interest in the case. And because the Hunan Provincial Department of State Security, which is currently handling Cheng Yuan’s case, is part of “state power,” he has to seek remedies through channels other than those in the state power system.

The police also asked him if he had thought about the risk of other people distorting or misusing his articles and the media interviews he had given. Cheng Hao said that he is willing to speak out as long as people are willing to listen, and that liability rests with the person who distorts his information. But just in case, he included a statement in this post to reserve his right to hold anyone who distorts information he provides responsible.

Cheng Yuan, a co-founder of an NGO, was seized and held in custody on July 22, 2019, by the Changsha Municipal Bureau of State Security for “subversion of state power.”  Cheng Hao has been making efforts to appeal for his brother.












2019 8 12

Explore Topics

709 Crackdown Access to Information Access to Justice Administrative Detention All about law Arbitrary Detention
Asset Transparency Bilateral Dialogue Black Jail Book Review Business And Human Rights Censorship
Charter 08 Children Chinese Law Circumvention technology Citizen Activism Citizen Journalists
Citizen Participation Civil Society Commentary Communist Party Of China Constitution Consumer Safety
Contending views Corruption Counterterrorism Courageous Voices Cultural Revolution Culture Matters
Current affairs Cyber Security Daily Challenges Democratic And Political Reform Demolition And Relocation  Dissidents
Education Elections Enforced Disappearance Environment Ethnic Minorities EU-China
Family Planning Farmers Freedom of Association Freedom of Expression Freedom of Press Freedom of Religion
Government Accountability Government regulation Government transparency Hong Kong House Arrest HRIC Translation
Hukou Human Rights Council Human rights developments Illegal Search And Detention Inciting Subversion Of State Power Information Control 
Information technology Information, Communications, Technology (ICT) International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR) International Human Rights International perspective International Relations
Internet Internet Governance JIansanjiang lawyers' rights defense Judicial Reform June Fourth Kidnapping
Labor Camps Labor Rights Land, Property, Housing Lawyer's rights Lawyers Legal System
Letters from the Mainland Major Event (Environment, Food Safety, Accident, etc.) Mao Zedong Microblogs (Weibo) National People's Congress (NPC) New Citizens Movement
Non-Governmental Organization (NGO) Olympics One country, two systems Online Activism Open Government Information Personal stories
Police Brutality Political commentary Political Prisoner Politics Prisoner Of Conscience Probing history
Propaganda Protests And Petitions Public Appeal Public Security Racial Discrimination Reeducation-Through-Labor
Rights Defenders Rights Defense Rule Of Law Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO) Special Topic State compensation
State Secrets State Security Subversion Of State Power Surveillance Technology Thoughts/Theories
Tiananmen Mothers Tibet Torture Typical cases United Nations US-China 
Uyghurs, Uighurs Vulnerable Groups Women Youth Youth Perspective